Question battery replacement after the start of the heating season, it sometimes rises very sharply. Often, radiators in old houses are in a deplorable state, and local services are in no hurry to overhaul the heating system. We will try to answer the most common questions and find out who should change old batteries in a privatized apartment.
- If a radiator leaks, who legally has to change it? Who pays for the installation and purchase of new equipment?
- If you want to install a more modern heating system in an apartment after privatization, who should do it? Do I need special permission for this?
- Who is responsible for the leak if the neighbors are flooded with water?
To answer these questions, you need to study Russian legislation and understand the legal aspects.
Heating radiators - common or private property?
It is possible to understand who should replace failed heating devices in a privatized apartment only by establishing who owns them. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 491 in August 2006 adopted rules governing the composition of common property in an apartment building. According to paragraph 6 of these rules, such property includes a heating system located inside the house. It includes:
- risers;
- fittings (regulating and shut-off);
- heating elements (radiators);
- general house meters of thermal energy;
- other types of equipment that is part of heating networks.
Unfortunately, when situations arise regarding the replacement of heating devices in apartments, both parties interpret these rules in their own interests. Homeowners believe that since the heating system belongs to common property, the replacement of faulty equipment should be handled by the house management organization. ZhEK employees, in turn, argue that only risers and batteries that pass through several residential premises, for example, those installed on stairwells, belong to the common property. When contacting utilities, residents often hear that there are malfunctions of all pipes and radiatorslocated within their apartment - this is the problem of its owners.
Who is right: residents or housing office?
Due to frequent appeals to the court and the Department of Housing and Public Utilities in 2007, the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation clarified the situation and reported that the heating elements located in private apartments are part of the common property of the house.
It follows from this that if a battery has leaked due to a high degree of wear or as a result of an accident, it should be changed by an organization that receives monthly money from residents in the form of deductions for overhaul and is responsible for maintaining and maintaining house property.
Management organizations are not interested in bringing this information to the attention of apartment owners, therefore, until now, residents are forced to pay for the dismantling and installation of a new heater, which, among other things, must be purchased independently.
Repair and replacement of a leaking battery
We found out that the heating system is part of the common property of an apartment building and also includes radiators located in the apartments. It follows that, regardless of whether the area is privatized or is municipal property, the managing organization, HOA or housing cooperative is obliged to repair or change the battery, which is in disrepair. In this case, no additional payment is taken from the owner of the property.
In other words, if the battery has leaked, then you need to call the master serving the house, and he will replace the failed heater for free.
In practice, things are not so simple. Housing office employees may claim that they do not have a replacement battery, so they will repair the old one or, even worse, remove the radiator, put plugs in and ask you to wait. Since this expectation can last for months, the owner of the apartment is simply forced to buy new equipment on his own, because no one wants to freeze in winter without heating.
There are cases when tenants, without waiting for a replacement, purchase a radiator at their own expense and hope that the DUK will pay them compensation. It’s definitely not worth counting on this, since even judicial practice suggests that the house management organization is not obliged to do this.
Replacing old radiators
If the batteries in the apartment are not in a state of disrepair, but I want to replace them, because they do not warm well or are simply obsolete, then you will have to solve this issue at your own expense. No organization will provide services for free. What should be done in this case?
Replacement approval
The first thing to do in order not to have unpleasant consequences in the future is to coordinate your actions.
- When replacing radiators with the same type, it is enough to simply notify the managing organization of the upcoming work.
- When replacing batteries with another type, which includes the possibility of a different configuration and an increase in the heating area, you need to contact a specialist for an examination regarding the possibility of installing new batteries. This is necessary because sometimes the installation of other radiators adversely affects the heat balance of the house. Examination is paid, is made at the expense of the owner of the apartment.
- When transferring heating equipment, an examination is also required.
Important! Sometimes a change in the configuration of heating devices and an increase in their number is perceived as a re-equipment of the premises with amendments to the technical passport of the apartment. In fact, the replacement of the battery is not reflected in the technical data sheet, since only the type of heat source is indicated there, without specifying specific heating devices.